Sunday, September 25, 2011

about monopolies....

Oroport’s allegation of unfair competition also fails because private monopolies are not necessarily prohibited by the Constitution. Certain public utilities must be given franchises for public interest and these franchises do not violate the law against monopolies.

Anglo-Fil Trading Corporation v. Lazaro, Nos. L-54958 and L-54966, September 2, 1983, 124 SCRA 494, 523.
By at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

THIRD DIVISION [ G.R. No. 235658, June 22, 2020 ] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. RAUL DEL ROSARIO Y NIEBRES, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

  THIRD DIVISION [ G.R. No. 235658, June 22,  2020  ] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. RAUL DEL ROSARIO Y NIEBRES, ACCUSED...

  • REGALIAN DOCTRINE
    But first, a peek at the Regalian principle and the power of the executive to reclassify lands of the public domain. The 1935 Constitution ...
  • jure gestionis or jure imperii.
    As expressed in Section 2 of Article II of the 1987 Constitution, we have adopted the generally accepted principles of International Law. ...
  • COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY/YAMASHITA STANDARD/ MEDINA STANDARD
    Command responsibility, sometimes referred to as the Yamashita standard or the Medina standard, is the doctrine of hierarchical accountabili...